Abstract

Abstract. Earth system models of intermediate complexity (EMICs) have proven to be able to simulate the large-scale features of glacial–interglacial climate evolution. For many climatic applications the spatial resolution of the EMICs' output is, however, too coarse, and downscaling methods are needed. In this study we introduce a way to use generalized additive models (GAMs) for downscaling the large-scale output of an EMIC in very different climatological conditions ranging from glacial periods to current relatively warm climates. GAMs are regression models in which a combination of explanatory variables is related to the response through a sum of spline functions. We calibrated the GAMs using observations of the recent past climate and the results of short time-slice simulations of glacial climate performed by the relatively high-resolution general circulation model CCSM (Community Climate System Model) and the regional climate model RCA3 (Rossby Centre regional Atmospheric climate model). As explanatory variables we used the output of a simulation by the CLIMBER-2 (CLIMate and BiosphERe model 2) EMIC of the last glacial cycle, coupled with the SICOPOLIS (SImulation COde for POLythermal Ice Sheets) ice sheet model, i.e. the large-scale temperature and precipitation data of CLIMBER-2, and the elevation, distance to ice sheet, slope direction and slope angle from SICOPOLIS. The fitted GAMs were able to explain more than 96% of the temperature response with a correlation of >0.98 and more than 59% of the precipitation response with a correlation of >0.72. The first comparison with two pollen-based reconstructions of temperature for Northern Europe showed that CLIMBER-2 data downscaled by GAMs corresponded better with the reconstructions than did the bilinearly interpolated CLIMBER-2 surface temperature.

Highlights

  • Climate risk assessments and bioclimatic studies on a millennial timescale require regional climate data

  • We investigated the usability of generalized additive models (GAMs) in downscaling the large-scale variables of the CLIMBER-2 Earth system models of intermediate complexity (EMIC) model simulations by Ganopolski et al (2010) over Europe in climatic conditions ranging from glacial to interglacial

  • The predictor side’s temperature, relative humidity, precipitation, lapse rate and, over ice-free areas, the terrain properties were extracted from the CLIMBER-2SICOPOLIS (SImulation COde for POLythermal Ice Sheets) simulation data by Ganopolski et al (2010) at 0, 44 and 21 kyr before present (BP) to represent the recent past, a stadial during MIS 3 and LGM, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Climate risk assessments and bioclimatic studies on a millennial timescale require regional climate data. Present state-ofthe-art comprehensive atmospheric general circulation models (GCMs), coupled with modules simulating the biosphere and sea ice, are major tools for the study of past, present and future climates The resolution of such global models is usually 100–300 km (Flato et al, 2013). Vrac et al (2007) introduced a statistical downscaling method for palaeoclimatological purposes, based on generalized additive models (GAMs; Wood, 2006) They fitted a GAM-type regression model by finding the statistical relationships between the observed recent past climate (1961– 1990) and the low-resolution CLIMBER-2 (CLIMate and BiosphERe Model 2) EMIC (Petoukhov et al, 2000, 2005) model simulation of recent past climate. The bilinearly interpolated CLIMBER-2 surface temperature and the downscaled temperature were compared to two temperature reconstructions: Laihalampi, Finland (Heikkilä and Seppä, 2003), and Gilltjärnen, Sweden (Antonsson et al, 2006)

Downscaling with generalized additive models
Calibrating the statistical model
Recent past climate
Glacial climate over Northern Europe
Glacial climate over Western Eurasia
Evaluation of the GAMs
Comparison with temperature reconstructions
Evaluation of GAMs for precipitation
Comparison of downscaled precipitation with observation
Evaluation of GAMs for temperature
Comparison of downscaled temperatures with observations
Discussion and conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.