Abstract

Abstract. For the interpretation of the storm event-induced landslide distribution for an area, deterministic methods are frequently used, while a region's landslide susceptibility is commonly predicted via a statistical approach based upon multi-temporal landslide inventories and environmental factors. In this study we try to use an event-based landslide inventory, a set of environmental variables and a triggering factor to build a susceptibility model for a region which is solved using a multivariate statistical method. Data for shallow landslides triggered by the 2002 typhoon, Toraji, in central western Taiwan, are selected for training the susceptibility model. The maximum rainfall intensity of the storm event is found to be an effective triggering factor affecting the landslide distribution and this is used in the model. The model is built for the Kuohsing region and validated using data from the neighboring Tungshih area and a subsequent storm event – the 2004 typhoon, Mindulle, which affected both the Kuohsing and the Tungshih areas. The results show that we can accurately interpret the landslide distribution in the study area and predict the occurrence of landslides in the neighboring region in a subsequent typhoon event. The advantage of this statistical method is that neither hydrological data, strength data, failure depth, nor a long-period landslide inventory is needed as input.

Highlights

  • Data in the Kuohsing quadrangle for shallow landslides triggered by typhoon Toraji were used for the EB-landslide susceptibility analysis (LSA)

  • The present study provides a statistical approach for the interpretation of the storm event-induced landslide distribution and for the mapping of regional landslide susceptibility

  • Results show that our event-based landslide susceptibility analysis (EB-LSA) for storm event-induced landslides is effective as confirmed by careful validation on a neighboring region and on a subsequent event

Read more

Summary

Introduction

To study storm event-induced landslides on a regional scale, a deterministic physical-based method is commonly used which requires the employment of an infinite-slope model and a hydrological model (Okimura and Ichikawa, 1985; Dietrich et al, 1986, 1995; Keefer et al, 1987; Montgomery and Dietrich, 1994; Wu and Sidle, 1995; Montgomery et al, 1998; Terlien, 1998; Crozer, 1999; Polemic and Sdao, 1999; Iverson, 2000; Borga et al, 2002; Wilkinson et al, 2002; Crosta and Frattini, 2003; Malet et al, 2005; Baum et al, 2005; Salciarini et al, 2006; Claessens et al, 2007a, 2007b; Schmidt et al, 2008). Many different methods and techniques for assessing landslide hazards have been proposed and tested These have already been systematically compared and their advantages and limitations outlined in the literature (Carrara, 1983; Varnes, 1984; Carrara et al, 1995; Hutchinson, 1995; Mantovani et al, 1996; Aleotti and Chowdury, 1999; Chung and Fabbri, 1999; Guzzetti et al, 1999; Wang et al, 2005; Chung, 2006; van Westen et al, 2006). In previous statistical models the triggering factors have seldom been emphasized

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call