Abstract

Random quantum sampling, a task to sample bit-strings from a random quantum circuit, is considered one of suitable benchmark tasks to demonstrate the outperformance of quantum computers even with noisy qubits. Recently, random quantum sampling was performed on the Sycamore quantum processor with 53 qubits [Nature 574, 505 (2019)] and on the Zuchongzhi quantum processor with 56 qubits [Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180501 (2021)]. Here, we analyze and compare statistical properties of the outputs of random quantum sampling by Sycamore and Zuchongzhi. Using the Marchenko-Pastur law and the Wasssertein distances, we find that quantum random sampling of Zuchongzhi is more closer to classical uniform random sampling than those of Sycamore. Some Zuchongzhi's bit-strings pass the random number tests while both Sycamore and Zuchongzhi show similar patterns in heatmaps of bit-strings. It is shown that statistical properties of both random quantum samples change little as the depth of random quantum circuits increases. Our findings raise a question about computational reliability of noisy quantum processors that could produce statistically different outputs for the same random quantum sampling task.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call