Abstract

Abstract Evaluation of general circulation model (GCM) experiments presents one of the most challenging statistical inference problems in the study of climate. The problem is similar and comparable in difficulty to that encountered in empirical studies of global climate, because the data sets take the form of small samples of large numbers of cross-correlated climate statistics. Thus, in the absence of detailed a priori hypotheses the ability to detect all but the strongest of climate signals is severely limited. Most studies directed at this problem have followed the lead of Chervin and Schneider and have emphasized parametric techniques to solve the univariate or “local” significance problem. Hasslemann was apparently the first to point out in the context of GCM problems that 1) a collection of “local” tests has dubious value in the absence of a “global” test, and 2) a sensitive global test is difficult to construct with multivariate methods without drastic a priori reduction in test dimensionality. Has...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call