Abstract

There is a growing trend to integrate noise figure measurement capabilities in microwave instruments originally devoted to other general purpose measurements as Vector Network Analyzers or Spectrum Analyzers. This opens up new possibilities to take into account vector corrections (at least in the case of VNA), or even to consider other techniques (such as cold-source) for computing the noise figure, different from the classical Y-factor approach used by most noise figure meters. In order to evaluate the suitability of these new options it is important to correctly analyze the benefits in terms of final accuracy that they can provide. However, errors in noise figure measurements have very different sources and nature, which sometimes do not allow straight forward conclusions on measurement accuracy. In this paper, a consistent evaluation of systematic errors and measurement uncertainty associated to different methodologies is presented. For that, the recommendations of the IEC-ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) are followed. Some representative examples are given to illustrate the interest of the analysis.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.