Abstract

The performance of disease surveillance systems is evaluated and monitored using a diverse set of statistical analyses throughout each stage of surveillance implementation. An overview of their main elements is presented, with a specific emphasis on syndromic surveillance directed to outbreak detection in resource-limited settings. Statistical analyses are proposed for three implementation stages: planning, early implementation, and consolidation. Data sources and collection procedures are described for each analysis.During the planning and pilot stages, we propose to estimate the average data collection, data entry and data distribution time. This information can be collected by surveillance systems themselves or through specially designed surveys. During the initial implementation stage, epidemiologists should study the completeness and timeliness of the reporting, and describe thoroughly the population surveyed and the epidemiology of the health events recorded. Additional data collection processes or external data streams are often necessary to assess reporting completeness and other indicators. Once data collection processes are operating in a timely and stable manner, analyses of surveillance data should expand to establish baseline rates and detect aberrations. External investigations can be used to evaluate whether abnormally increased case frequency corresponds to a true outbreak, and thereby establish the sensitivity and specificity of aberration detection algorithms.Statistical methods for disease surveillance have focused mainly on the performance of outbreak detection algorithms without sufficient attention to the data quality and representativeness, two factors that are especially important in developing countries. It is important to assess data quality at each state of implementation using a diverse mix of data sources and analytical methods. Careful, close monitoring of selected indicators is needed to evaluate whether systems are reaching their proposed goals at each stage.

Highlights

  • Most analyses performed with data from disease surveillance systems focus on establishing baseline disease rates and testing outbreak detection algorithms [1,2]

  • In Peru, reporting rates are monitored weekly for Alerta and Early Warning Outbreak Response System (EWORS), and these analyses showed that

  • Researchers conducting statistical analyses applied to disease surveillance systems often place more interest on outbreak detection algorithms [2,4,6], describing in substantially less detail the systems' performance, data quality and the epidemiological profile of the population under surveillance

Read more

Summary

Background

Most analyses performed with data from disease surveillance systems focus on establishing baseline disease rates and testing outbreak detection algorithms [1,2]. Specific emphasis is placed on statistical analyses needed for syndromic surveillance systems implemented in resource-limited settings aiming at early warning and outbreak detection. During the patient profile analyses conducted with EWORS data, three clearly defined combinations of symptoms (that we will refer to as 'syndromes') consistently accounted for most cases reported in different countries (Table 3). This finding limits the need to monitor the nearly countless numbers of other possible combinations of symptoms.

Discussion
Conclusion
Buckeridge DL
Corwin A: Developing regional outbreak response capabilities
12. World Health Organization
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call