Statin treatment improves response to anti-PD1 agents in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma and non-small cell lung cancer.

Abstract

3074 Background: After progression to standard chemotherapy, only a small proportion of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) benefit from anti-programmed cell death (PD-1) treatment. Combination strategies might improve response. In pre-clinical models, statins showed vaccine adjuvant activities and synergized with anti-PD1 agents. In this multi-center study, we evaluated the impact of baseline statin treatment in MPM and NSCLC pts. Methods: We separately examined MPM and NSCLC pts treated with anti-PD1 monotherapy after progression to standard chemotherapy at two European academic institutions. As control cohort, MPM pts treated with first-line chemotherapy were also examined. Pts receiving statins at start of treatment were compared with those who did not. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Results: A total of 287 patients were examined. Twenty-seven out of 80 (34%) MPM and 36 out of 130 (20%) NSCLC pts received statins at start of anti-PD1 treatment. The most common statins were simvastatin, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin. In MPM pts, statin use was associated with improved ORR (22% versus 5%, P = 0.05), longer PFS (median 6.7 versus 2.4 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23–0.77, P < 0.01), and longer OS (median not reached versus 6.0 months, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21–0.85, P = 0.01). In NSCLC pts, statin use was associated with improved ORR (40% versus 22%, P = 0.04), longer PFS (median 7.8 versus 3.6 months, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37–0.97.2, P = 0.03) but similar OS (median 13.1 versus 10.1 months, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.49–1.28, P = 0.30). At multivariate analyses, after adjusting for ECOG performance status (PS) and histological subtype, the impact of statins remained significant for ORR, PFS and OS in MPM and for PFS in NSCLC. Conversely, no association between statin use and outcomes was found in 77 MPM pts treated with first-line chemotherapy. Conclusions: This study shows that statin use at start of anti-PD1 treatment improves response to anti-PD1 agents in MPM and NSCLC pts who progressed to standard chemotherapy in routine clinical practice. This association could not be found in MPM pts treated with first-line chemotherapy, thus suggesting a synergy between statins and anti-PD1 agents. Prospective studies are needed to confirm whether the combination of statin and anti-PD1 therapy could improve outcome in pts with poorly immunogenic thoracic malignancies.