Abstract

The analysis of pyramidal trusses has an immediate practical interest since these structures are currently used in many present-day civil constructions, either as main parts or a constitutive element. They can be used to represent tripod-like structures, cap of masts, tower cranes, big span roofs, and even a portion of a single-layer geodesic dome or of a generic-shaped reticulated shell. This paper examines the nonlinear static stability and load capacity for a simple class of space trusses in the shape of a regular pyramid. Joints located at the vertices of the base polygon are fixed while the joint at the apex is subjected to static loads acting in either the vertical direction, in the horizontal plane, or along a generic oblique direction. Despite their apparent simplicity, these structural systems exhibit a wide variety of post-critical responses, not exhausted by the classical snapping and bifurcation phenomena. In addition to regular primary and secondary branches, the equilibrium paths may include neutral branches, namely branches entirely composed of bifurcation or limit points. The analysis is conducted using the Finite Element Method together with a corotational formulation for the bars. The numerical results are validated in the elastic domain using the closed-form solutions found in literature.

Highlights

  • In this work the large displacement response of a class of space trusses in the shape of a regular pyramid is studied using a finite element formulation

  • Pyramidal trusses possess an immediate practical interest since they are currently used in many present-day civil constructions, either as main parts or as minor elements

  • For n = 4 and a large height to base ratio, the truss may represent the cap of a mast or, if the load acts transversally, the extremity of a three-dimensional cantilever beam or of the jib of a tower crane

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In this work the large displacement response of a class of space trusses in the shape of a regular pyramid is studied using a finite element formulation. For n = 4 and a large height to base ratio, the truss may represent the cap of a mast or, if the load acts transversally, the extremity of a three-dimensional cantilever beam or of the jib of a tower crane. For n = 5 or n = 6 and a small height to base ratio, the truss may represent a molecule of a single-layer geodesic dome or of a generic-shaped reticulated shell [6]. The paper is organized as follows: in Section 2, the system equilibrium equations are posed considering an elastic response and thick elements.

Analytic Model
Analysis
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.