Abstract

Nearly all exogenous loading models of bone adaptation apply dynamic loading superimposed upon a time invariant static preload (SPL) in order to ensure stable, reproducible loading of bone. Given that SPL may alter aspects of bone mechanotransduction (eg, interstitial fluid flow), we hypothesized that SPL inhibits bone formation induced by dynamic loading. As a first test of this hypothesis, we utilized a newly developed device that enables stable dynamic loading of the murine tibia with SPLs ≥ -0.01 N. We subjected the right tibias of BALB/c mice (4-month-old females) to dynamic loading (-3.8 N, 1 Hz, 50 cycles/day, 10 s rest) superimposed upon one of three SPLs: -1.5 N, -0.5 N, or -0.03 N. Mice underwent exogenous loading 3 days/week for 3 weeks. Metaphyseal trabecular bone adaptation (μCT) and midshaft cortical bone formation (dynamic histomorphometry) were assessed following euthanasia (day 22). Ipsilateral tibias of mice loaded with a -1.5-N SPL demonstrated significantly less trabecular bone volume/total volume (BV/TV) than contralateral tibias (-12.9%). In contrast, the same dynamic loading superimposed on a -0.03-N SPL significantly elevated BV/TV versus contralateral tibias (12.3%) and versus the ipsilateral tibias of the other SPL groups (-0.5 N: 46.3%, -1.5 N: 37.2%). At the midshaft, the periosteal bone formation rate (p.BFR) induced when dynamic loading was superimposed on -1.5-N and -0.5-N SPLs was significantly amplified in the -0.03-N SPL group (>200%). These data demonstrate that bone anabolism induced by dynamic loading is markedly inhibited by SPL magnitudes commonly implemented in the literature (ie, -0.5 N, -1.5 N). The inhibitory impact of SPL has not been recognized in bone adaptation models and, as such, SPLs have been neither universally reported nor standardized. Our study therefore identifies a previously unrecognized, potent inhibitor of mechanoresponsiveness that has potentially confounded studies of bone adaptation and translation of insights from our field. © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Highlights

  • The enhanced skeletal mass and morphology observed in athletes and other highly active individuals is thought to predominantly arise as a result of the skeleton’s lifelong exposure to dynamic loading.[1,2,3,4] Numerous facets of dynamic loading have been associated with amplifying the anabolic benefit of skeletal loading in preclinical studies

  • Finite element analysis (FEA) models suggest that the end loading magnitude predominantly implemented to induce an anabolic trabecular response (À9 N) causes peak normal strains ranging from À2800 to À3300 me at the tibia midshaft.[16,17] In contrast, locomotion in mice generates peak tibia midshaft normal strains that are less than 25% of the lower end of that range.[18]

  • For the À3.8-N load implemented in vivo, peak longitudinal normal strains of À2490 Æ 260 me were induced at the tibia midshaft and À1600 Æ 110 me in metaphyseal trabecular bone (Fig. 4C)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The enhanced skeletal mass and morphology observed in athletes and other highly active individuals is thought to predominantly arise as a result of the skeleton’s lifelong exposure to dynamic loading.[1,2,3,4] Numerous facets of dynamic loading have been associated with amplifying the anabolic benefit of skeletal loading in preclinical studies (eg, magnitude, rate, cycle number, frequency, rest intervals, etc.[5,6,7,8,9]) These insights have not led to effective exercise interventions that augment bone mass in adult humans.[10,11,12]. Our review of tibia axial compression studies to date revealed that, with two exceptions,(15,19) SPL has varied from À0.5 N to over À2 N

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call