Abstract
A stationary stimulus is perceived to drift in the opposite direction after adaptation to a moving stimulus (static motion aftereffect (MAE)). It is commonly assumed that positional effects from the static motion aftereffect are mediated by early visual areas. Here we psychophysically showed that these positional effects did not modulate illusory line-tilt aftereffect (TAE). Since illusory contours seem to be represented at relatively early stages of visual hierarchy, we suggest that the neural substrates underlying the perception of static motion aftereffect and illusory contours are different.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
