Abstract
This paper is the third step of project “Static mantle distribution, Equation, Solution and Application”. It consists of < Static Mantle Distribution 1 Equation>, <Static Mantle Density Distribution 2 Improved Equation and Solution>, and this paper. Our result on shape of core is a “X type”, which differs from the traditional view that core is a sphere. Which one is correct? or, both are not correct? The aim of thispaper is to study dimpling and bucking of the spherical crust under mantle loading. Dimpling analysis depends on the outer solution of non-homogeneous non-linear D.E., while bucking analysis depends on non-linear Eigen value of the homogeneous D. E The results based on two models and governing equations show that crust dimpled at poles is proved theoretically and numerical result well consists with pole radius, while the non-linear bucking Eigen value boundary problem is solved by decomposition method. The results show that bucking can occur, and the un-continuity of internal force per unit length causes un-continuity of masses by mantle material emitting to crust at turning point of “X”. The growing of Tibet high-land might be viewed as an evidence of the mass ms(θ0)increasing due to mantle emission. Both poles radius and equatorial radius have been used to support our analysis. Question: how the nature makes cold at poles?
Highlights
This paper is the third step of project “Static mantle distribution, Equation, Solution and Application”, consists of < Static Mantle Distribution 1 Equation> [1], < Static Mantle Density Distribution 2 Improved Equation and Solution> [2] and this paper
– radius of basic plane, h – thickness of the shell, E – elastic modulus, ν- Poisson’s ratio, deformed meridian curve with Z(0)=0,
Summary
This paper is the third step of project “Static mantle distribution, Equation, Solution and Application”, consists of < Static Mantle Distribution 1 Equation> [1], < Static Mantle Density Distribution 2 Improved Equation and Solution> [2] and this paper. The major result on static mantle distribution inside the Earth is a “X type” in crosssection. The knowledge or sources of information about interior of earth is obtained by indirect methods such as analysis of rocks from mining area, volcanic eruption, and earthquake etc. In such a situation, no directly observation and no experiment can be done, how to prove the accuracy of our results?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.