Abstract
Soaring flight is a remarkable adaptation to reduce movement costs by taking advantage of atmospheric uplifts. The movement pattern of soaring birds is shaped by the spatial and temporal availability and intensity of uplifts, which result from an interaction of local weather conditions with the underlying landscape structure. We used soaring flight locations and vertical speeds of an obligate soaring species, the white stork (Ciconia ciconia), as proxies for uplift availability and intensity. We then tested if static landscape features such as topography and land cover, instead of the commonly used weather information, could predict and map the occurrence and intensity of uplifts across Europe. We found that storks encountering fewer uplifts along their routes, as determined by static landscape features, suffered higher energy expenditures, approximated by their overall body dynamic acceleration. This result validates the use of static features as uplift predictors and suggests the existence of a direct link between energy expenditure and static landscape structure, thus far largely unquantified for flying animals. Our uplift availability map represents a computationally efficient proxy of the distribution of movement costs for soaring birds across the world's landscapes. It thus provides a base to explore the effects of changes in the landscape structure on the energy expenditure of soaring birds, identify low-cost movement corridors and ultimately inform the planning of anthropogenic developments.
Highlights
All animals interact with the surrounding environment, but for some of them the role of this environment becomes & 2019 The Authors
Static features of the landscape proved to be highly effective in identifying areas suitable for uplifts
The uplift suitability predicted along the birds’ migratory route using only static features, showed a clear negative relationship with the overall dynamic body acceleration (ODBA) of individuals flying over those areas, indicating that birds encountering fewer uplifts along their routes experienced higher energy expenditures
Summary
All animals interact with the surrounding environment, but for some of them the role of this environment becomes . Relevant in constraining or supporting their movement. This especially applies to aerial or aquatic animals, 2 whose movements actively modify and are, in turn, modified by the surrounding fluid [1,2,3]. Air does not provide constant support against gravity and its properties vary at different temporal and spatial scales depending on turbulence. To save energy, flying animals adjust timing, routes and flight modes to this turbulence [4], maximizing the advantage of horizontal and vertical air currents [5]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.