Abstract

Support to energy, particularly hydropower, has formed an important element of many donor programmes. How have such interventions shaped the emergence of particular energy imaginaries in the countries engaged with? ‘Energy imaginaries’ can be understood as the set of institutions, logics, values, and visions that spur ideas around what sources of energy and forms of energy governance best foster development. Adopting a historical and comparative perspective and drawing on the notion of ‘transnational assemblages’, we explore the nature of energy aid interventions and the dynamic shifts of specific actors and discourses in bilateral relations. We focus on Norway, a leading player in energy support, and two of its long-term partner countries, Nepal and Tanzania. Through document analysis and interviews with key actors, we trace how Norwegian energy transnational assemblages have formed part of evolving energy imaginaries in Nepal and Tanzania in radically diverging ways. In Nepal, dominated by an energy imaginary of hydropower as ‘white gold’, efforts to foster a bottom-up-driven indigent energy sector were eclipsed by an emphasis on facilitating privatisation, resulting in a chaotic fragmentation of the energy landscape. In Tanzania, the donor-state energy imaginaries were centred on grandiose projects of hydropowered industrialisation bound for failure, but later revived as part of an authoritarian project. The study untangles a history of changing and partially conflicting discourses, offering a richer and more nuanced understanding than studies focused on single projects or policies. We highlight how the idea of transnational assemblages can be useful in understanding shifting imaginaries of energy development.

Highlights

  • The rise of particular energy imaginaries is shaped by shifting socioeconomic, political, ideological and environmental dynamics and dominant values, logics, and contingencies

  • While global assemblages focus on how global forms are articulated in specific settings, and translocal assemblages explores the ways in which assemblages are constituted in specific localities, the notion of transnational assemblages captures the dynamic shifts of specific actors and discourses in bilateral relations – in our case, Norway-Nepal and Norway-Tanzania

  • Tanzania occupied a significant space in Norwegian bilateral aid relations, While some of the staff working for Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) at the time began raising concerns about human rights issues – in relation to the ujamaa policy – the will to believe in Nyerere's policies and images of the future was so powerful on the political left that such warnings went unheeded [52, 60]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The rise of particular energy imaginaries is shaped by shifting socioeconomic, political, ideological and environmental dynamics and dominant values, logics, and contingencies. Energy imaginaries are intimately connected with the materiality of infrastructures and energy resources, and thinking about imaginaries is helpful in denaturalising spatial relations that are often seen as fixed, as well as reflecting on questions of national identities [1, 18] They are shaped by the sets of institutions, logics, values, and visions, giving rise to specific ideas around what sources of energy and forms of energy governance are the most optimal in terms of bringing about development (ibid.). While global assemblages focus on how global forms are articulated in specific settings, and translocal assemblages explores the ways in which assemblages are constituted in specific localities, the notion of transnational assemblages captures the dynamic shifts of specific actors and discourses in bilateral relations – in our case, Norway-Nepal and Norway-Tanzania These relations are embedded in larger discourses on aid, energy, and development, and global forms such as neoliberalism

Methods
From rags to energy riches
Shifting energy aid assemblages
Energy imaginaries in Nepal
Overview
Hydropower in Nepal and Norwegian involvement
Policy rupture: privatisation gains ground
Energy imaginaries in Tanzania
Fragmentation and chaotic pluralism
Energy development and Norwegian engagement
Reforms and resistance
The centrality of state control
A tale of two trajectories
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call