Abstract
Most serious health system reform proposals include a prominent role for states, despite documented variation in costs, delivery systems, and health status among states. As policymakers search for an approach that will reform the health system and minimize inappropriate interstate variation, the experience of nursing home policies and politics in two states--New York and California--can offer useful lessons about underlying reasons for variation and how to ensure equitability amidst state differences. These two states are examined as case studies because they have the nation's two largest Medicaid programs yet have approached their long-term care systems very differently. The differences in their nursing home policy approaches suggest that state-based health system reform be pursued with caution, lacking further study of state variations.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
