Abstract

During its 1988 term, the U.S. Supreme Court addressed two important aspects of the Eleventh Amendment, which generally protects statesfrom being sued infederal courts. First, the Court held that the Congress has power to abrogate states' immunityfrom suit-to subject states to suits infederal courts for damages-under Congress' expansive commerce-clause power. Second, the Court made clear that such abrogation would be found only where the text of the statute itself, as distinct from its legislative history, clearly and specifically so provided. This article describes these decisions, and analyzes some of their implications for judicial federalism.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.