Abstract
Using the discourse of Shaykh Muhammad Mahdi Shams al-Din, this article examines the contestation of sovereignty in Lebanon. His discourse on questions of sovereignty and agency offers an alternative vision of modernity that is part of an evolving struggle in the Lebanese political system. Lebanon’s consociational democratic system of structured political sectarianism necessitated an enmeshed and interactive theological, organizational, and political response. The article asks how political and ideational challenge – in the sense of empowering a disempowered group – occurs within a dominant political system of democratic exclusion? In addition, the geo-political reality of diminished state-level sovereignty, both vis-a-vis regional and international powers and domestically, in state institutions, functions, and relations, begs the question of how conditions of structured exclusion affect the state’s ability to act autonomously and in the interests of the majority of its citizens? I argue that Shams al-Din’s discourse sought to reform the status quo by emphasizing a post-sectarian accommodative vision. The essence of this vision emphasized the role of the resistant struggle (al-muqawama) for truth, justice, and inclusiveness as integral to the achievement of muwatana or citizenship (ownership / voice in the nation-state) as well as nationalist sovereignty, both of which he contextualized historically and politically within open and constructive relationships with their broader Arab, Islamic, and Human milieus. Shams al-Din’s idealistic but politically-engaged vision drew on the Sunni concept of (consultation) shura and traditional Shi‘i texts to frame just rule as an aspirational struggle and as a post-sectarian framework for political and societal organization based on taqrib (drawing closer, searching for commonalities) that stretches beyond borders. This vision outlined an interactive and interdependent relationship whereby national sovereignty is fortified for being embedded in its society and in the agency of its citizens, and vice versa.
Highlights
Cover Page Footnote I am indebted to Professor Scott Lucas and ‘Ali Shamseddine for their thoughtful suggestions
The consociational model in Lebanon divides all positions in the state based on a demographically-outdated formula purporting to be proportionally representative of the demographically multicultural society
Citizenship that possesses agency, in the sense of having an effective voice and a sense of ownership in the nation-state, fortifies state level sovereignty. This type of sovereignty is embedded in society: state legitimacy and authority are a function of the scope to which constituents in society are convinced that they have a vested interest in extant and predominant socioeconomic and political arrangements
Summary
Recommended Citation Jadallah, Dina (2014) "State Sovereignty and Citizen Agency: The Nationalist-Islamic Discourse of Shaykh Muhammad Mahdi Shams al-Din," Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Multidisciplinary Studies: Vol 3 : Iss. 1 , Article 4.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Multidisciplinary Studies: Mathal
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.