Abstract
The aim of this chapter is to contribute to the debate about the role of the state in industrial development through an examination of South Korea, which has been widely heralded as a case supporting the opponents of state intervention. Our research suggests, however, that the South Korean experience has been seriously misrepresented. Contrary to earlier contentions, Korea has in fact resorted extensively to ‘directive’ forms of state intervention over the last two decades.1 The view taken is that the Korean experience supports the advocates of directive state intervention in market economics.KeywordsForeign Direct InvestmentForeign InvestmentFair TradeForeign ExchangeIndustrial PolicyThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
