Abstract
The paper explores the professionalization process of Chinese social scientists interested in industrial relations. Content analysis of more than 7,000 publication records in two top Chinese-language academic journals during 1985-2011 suggests that the academic research on industrial relations in China has lagged behind rising labor problems. Additionally, IR research is less responsive to the state and transnational private regulation of labor standards. These general trends, however, differ between sociologists and management scholars. Sociologists are more likely to engage in IR research, especially on two important phenomena during China’s economic reform: those laid off by SOEs and migrant workers employed in private and foreign invested firms. In contrast, management scholars tend to examine motivational factors that improve team performance in semi-professional workplaces. I argue that an integration of both perspectives is important for the development of an IR field in China, especially given the recent state effort to establish stand-alone academic units devoted to IR research.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.