Abstract

Increasingly visible climate change consequences challenge carbon-based economies worldwide. While expert knowledge on climate change percolates through political initiatives and public awareness, its translation into large-scale policy actions appears limited. Climate change consequences unequally target regions, countries and social classes, a vital issue for social cooperation. When facing an imminent ecological collapse, in which conditions can self-interested agents gain environmental awareness and settle on a sustainable path of actions when their knowledge of the imminent collapse is bounded? This cooperation emerges from the interaction between individuals and the interaction of various cognitive processes within individuals. This article develops an agent-based model for this emergence of cooperation enriched with the Agent Zero neurocognitive grounded cognitive architecture. We investigate when agents endowed with deliberative, affective and social modules can settle on actions that safeguard their environment through numerical simulations. Our results show that cooperation on sustainable actions is the strongest when the system is at the edge of collapse. Policy measures that increase the environment’s resilience become internalized by the agents and undermine awareness of the ecological catastrophe. Depending on the cognitive channels activated, agent behaviors and reactions to specific interventions significantly vary. Our analysis suggests that taking different cognitive channels, deliberative, affective, social, and others into account, significantly impact results. The complexity of agent cognition deserves more attention to assess parameter sensitivity in social simulation models.

Highlights

  • Wildfires, flooding, hurricanes: more extreme weather events attributed to climate change seem to happen each year

  • One critical obstacle to such awareness may be the unequal distribution of climate change consequences on the planet (King and Harrington 2018)

  • We propose an agent-based model that explores the dynamics of a collective-risk social dilemma

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wildfires, flooding, hurricanes: more extreme weather events attributed to climate change seem to happen each year. Environmental awareness as consciousness in the population and political structures of the extend of the threat appears limited, as the undertaken actions fail to match the severity of the danger (Eriksen et al 2014). Countries and populations less harmed by climate change may not internalize the extent of the threat for more impacted communities. Several difficulties arise when studying the emergence of awareness in a population facing an ecological danger. One may become aware of climate change and willing to change one’s actions for deliberative reasons, such as reading the scientific literature on the topic. Another may adopt this stance facing the emotion of a newsworthy catastrophe somewhere on the planet. There are many ways environmental awareness could arise

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.