Standing of Mortgage Rights on Cultivation Rights That Have Been Determined as Deflanded Land in Solok District

Abstract

Cultivation Right are rights to exploit land which is directly controlled by the state for agricultural, fishery or livestock companies for a period of time. One of the reasons for the removal of the cultivation right was because it was neglected. cultivation rights is one of the land rights that can be used as collateral for debt and encumbered with mortgage rights. The write-off of the mortgage rights because the write-off of land rights that are encumbered with a security right does not cause the guaranteed debt to be written off. In practice, the abolition of the cultivation right which is being subject to mortgage rights due to a decision to determine abandoned land creates confusion regarding the repayment of debts between the debtor (PT. Karatau Limo Sajati) and the creditor (PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk.) And the difficulty of utilizing the former cultivation right object which is has been designated as abandoned land. The problems in this research are 1) how is the process of controlling cultivation right as an object of abandoned land in Solok Regency ? 2) what is the position of the mortgage rights above the cutivation rights which has been designated as abandoned land in Solok Regency ? 3) how is the utilization of the ex-cultivation rights land on which a mortgage has been imposed after it has been designated as abandoned land in Solok Regency ? The approach method used is juridical empirical, the nature of the research is descriptive analytical, the research data used is in the form of primary data, namely through interviews with sources and literature study to obtain secondary data. The data is processed systematically and analytically. The results showed that 1) the control process of PT. Karatau Limo Sajati as an abandoned land object which is carried out by means of inventory, identification and research, warnings, the proposal to determine abandoned land and the determination of abandoned land can actually be canceled through a lawsuit to the PTUN based on the weaknesses in the warning process. 2) the position of the mortgage over the cultivation rights which has been designated as abandoned land has been abolished, but the abolition of the mortgage because the termination of the land title does not cause the guaranteed debt to be canceled and subsequently the debtor's debt repayment is regulated in Articles 1131 and 1132 of the KUH Perdata. 3) The utilization of the ex-cultivation rights land on which a mortgage is imposed after it is designated as abandoned land is subject to a delay from BPN RI.