Abstract
This paper demonstrates that the conventional neoclassical arguments for recommending a uniform discharge tax in preference to a uniform discharge standard are founded on highly restrictive and unrealistic abstractions of the pollution process. Relaxation of the assumptions reveals that the uniform standard outperforms the uniform tax in controlling ambient pollution levels over a potentially wide range of parameter values. The results of a study on agricultural sediment control are reported. It is argued that this pollution process is predisposed to the conditions that favour the ‘cross‐over’ in efficiency ranking between the two policies. These conditions are a high correlation between discharge abatement costs and pollution transport coefficients, and high variability in pollution transport coefficients relative to the interfirm abatement costs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
