Abstract

Benchmark studies of insect populations are increasingly relevant and needed amid accelerating concern about insect trends in the Anthropocene. The growing recognition that insect populations may be in decline has given rise to a renewed call for insect population monitoring by scientists, and a desire from the broader public to participate in insect surveys. However, due to the immense diversity of insects and a vast assortment of data collection methods, there is a general lack of standardization in insect monitoring methods, such that a sudden and unplanned expansion of data collection may fail to meet its ecological potential or conservation needs without a coordinated focus on standards and best practices. To begin to address this problem, we provide simple guidelines for maximizing return on proven inventory methods that will provide insect benchmarking data suitable for a variety of ecological responses, including occurrence and distribution, phenology, abundance and biomass, and diversity and species composition. To track these responses, we present seven primary insect sampling methods—malaise trapping, light trapping, pan trapping, pitfall trappings, beating sheets, acoustic monitoring, and active visual surveys—and recommend standards while highlighting examples of model programs. For each method, we discuss key topics such as recommended spatial and temporal scales of sampling, important metadata to track, and degree of replication needed to produce rigorous estimates of ecological responses. We additionally suggest protocols for scalable insect monitoring, from backyards to national parks. Overall, we aim to compile a resource that can be used by diverse individuals and organizations seeking to initiate or improve insect monitoring programs in this era of rapid change.

Highlights

  • “The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago

  • Given increased societal interest in insects, there is the potential for widespread, long-term monitoring at the scale necessary to benchmark and track insect trends moving forward

  • Contact and ultrasonic sensors have been successful in detecting insect pests that live inside agricultural products (Mankin et al, 2011), we focus here on acoustic recording units and their use for surveying the relative abundance and diversity of insects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

“The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The second best time is now.” -Unattributed proverb. New monitoring efforts should align methods, metadata, and data access with those that already exist to increase explanatory power, streamline analysis, and facilitate the development of a global insect monitoring network. This network is already beginning to form through the efforts of organizations like PollardBase (Taron and Ries, 2015), the National Moth Recording Scheme (Fox et al, 2011), the Global Malaise Program (Geiger et al, 2016), as well as regional efforts, taxon-specific programs (e.g., for monarch butterflies and lady beetles), and even groups of Twitter users organizing nights to check their porch lights for insects. The efforts of thousands working independently are most valuable when those efforts can be assembled into a collective whole

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call