Abstract
ABSTRACT This research investigates whether investor-owned (IO) hospitals provide equivalent charity care as not-for-profit (NFP) hospitals in a reduced uncompensated care environment (post Affordable Care Act). Gross revenues, Total Uncompensated Charges (TUC), and a new measure, Standardized Patient Service Benefits (SPSB), are computed for not-for-profit and investor-owned hospitals. The SPSB is calculated based on Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs) for each discharge and does not allow for local hospital price manipulation. This eliminates pricing differences between hospitals for similar services when evaluating charity care. Using patient discharges classified as charity care, IO hospitals appear to provide more charity care than NFP hospitals when measuring by the TUC. When the TUC is adjusted for the corresponding DRG value (SPSB), the amount of charity care for not-for-profit hospitals exceeds investor-owned hospitals, a reversal from the TUC results. This research adds to the existing body of knowledge by introducing a new standardized measure, SPSB. This method eliminates pricing differences and may be used for ownership comparisons when hospitals charge varying amounts for similar services. Additionally, the results indicate that revenue manipulation may inflate the perceived amount of charity care and potential tax benefit.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
