Abstract
BackgroundQuantitative bone SPECT/CT is useful for disease follow up and inter-patient comparison. For bone metastatic malignant lesions, spine is the most commonly invaded site. However, Quantitative studies with large sample size investigating all the segments of normal cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae are seldom reported. This study was to evaluate the quantitative tomography of normal vertebrae using 99mTc-MDP with SPECT/CT to investigate the feasibility of standardized uptake value (SUV) for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant bone lesions.MethodsA retrospective study was carried out involving 221 patients (116 males and 105 females) who underwent SPECT/CT scan using 99mTc-MDP. The maximum SUV (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean) and CT values (Hounsfield Unit, HU) of 2416 normal vertebrae bodies, 157 benign bone lesions and 118 malignant bone metastasis foci were obtained. The correlations between SUVmax of normal vertebrae and CT values of normal vertebrae, age, height, weight, BMI of patients were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed with data of normal, benign and malignant groups corresponding to same sites and gender.ResultsThe SUVmax and SUVmean of normal vertebrae in males were markedly higher than those in females (P < 0.0009). The SUVmax of each normal vertebral segment showed a strong negative correlation with CT values in both males and females (r = − 0.89 and − 0.92, respectively; P < 0.0009). The SUVmax of normal vertebrae also showed significant correlation with weight, height, and BMI in males (r = 0.4, P < 0.0009; r = 0.28, P = 0.005; r = 0.22, P = 0.026), and significant correlation with weight and BMI in females (r = 0.32, P = 0.009; r = 0.23, P = 0.031). The SUVmax of normal group, benign bone lesion group and malignant bone metastasis foci group showed statistical differences in both males and females.ConclusionOur study evaluated SUVmax and SUVmean of normal vertebrae, benign bone lesion and malignant bone metastasis foci with a large sample population. Preliminary results proved the potential value of SUVmax in differentiation benign and malignant bone lesions. The results may provide a quantitative reference for clinical diagnosis and the evaluation of therapeutic response in vertebral lesions.
Highlights
Quantitative bone SPECT/CT is useful for disease follow up and inter-patient comparison
SPECT reconstruction was performed based on the B31s CT attenuation map of ordered subsets conjugate gradient (OSCG) enhanced with 2 subsets and 28 iterations without post-smoothing, which generate SPECT data allowing standardized uptake value (SUV) based on body weight (SUVbw) quantification and measurement of Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and Mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) using xSPECT reconstruction algorithm
The detailed inclusion number, CT value, SUVmax and SUVmean of normal vertebrae in male and female patients were shown in Additional file 1 and 2, respectively
Summary
Quantitative bone SPECT/CT is useful for disease follow up and inter-patient comparison. This study was to evaluate the quantitative tomography of normal vertebrae using 99mTc-MDP with SPECT/CT to investigate the feasibility of standardized uptake value (SUV) for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant bone lesions. Quantitative positron emission tomography (PET) bone imaging based on fluorine-18-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) is considered to have potential clinical value. Arvola et al [5] proved that standardized uptake value (SUV) obtained from SPECT images of bone metastases of breast and prostate cancer were significantly correlated with SUV obtained from PET images. These findings indicated the feasibility of SPECT quantification using SUV in clinic
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.