Abstract

BackgroundThe Human Cell Differentiation Molecules (HCDM) organizes Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigen (HLDA) workshops to test and name clusters of antibodies that react with a specific antigen. These cluster of differentiation (CD) markers have provided the scientific community with validated antibody clones, consistent naming of targets and reproducible identification of leukocyte subsets. Still, quantitative CD marker expression profiles and benchmarking of reagents at the single-cell level are currently lacking.ObjectiveTo develop a flow cytometric procedure for quantitative expression profiling of surface antigens on blood leukocyte subsets that is standardized across multiple research laboratories.MethodsA high content framework to evaluate the titration and reactivity of Phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) was created. Two flow cytometry panels were designed: an innate cell tube for granulocytes, dendritic cells, monocytes, NK cells and innate lymphoid cells (12-color) and an adaptive lymphocyte tube for naive and memory B and T cells, including TCRγδ+, regulatory-T and follicular helper T cells (11-color). The potential of these 2 panels was demonstrated via expression profiling of selected CD markers detected by PE-conjugated antibodies and evaluated using 561 nm excitation.ResultsUsing automated data annotation and dried backbone reagents, we reached a robust workflow amenable to processing hundreds of measurements in each experiment in a 96-well plate format. The immunophenotyping panels enabled discrimination of 27 leukocyte subsets and quantitative detection of the expression of PE-conjugated CD markers of interest that could quantify protein expression above 400 units of antibody binding capacity. Expression profiling of 4 selected CD markers (CD11b, CD31, CD38, CD40) showed high reproducibility across centers, as well as the capacity to benchmark unique clones directed toward the same CD3 antigen.ConclusionWe optimized a procedure for quantitative expression profiling of surface antigens on blood leukocyte subsets. The workflow, bioinformatics pipeline and optimized flow panels enable the following: 1) mapping the expression patterns of HLDA-approved mAb clones to CD markers; 2) benchmarking new antibody clones to established CD markers; 3) defining new clusters of differentiation in future HLDA workshops.

Highlights

  • Since the development of hybridoma technology in 1975 [1], monoclonal antibody production has been instrumental in examining protein expression and delineate cell types

  • The position of each PE reagent was assigned to a well of the 96-well plate, printed out and the Experiment Master Table” (EMT) tables represented the history of the processed experiments

  • After acquisition on the High Throughput Sampler (HTS), proper compensation of the PE channel was verified using fluorescence minus one (FMO) control wells, and the files were exported as FCS 3.0

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the development of hybridoma technology in 1975 [1], monoclonal antibody (mAb) production has been instrumental in examining protein expression and delineate cell types. The need for quality assessment of antibody clones and consistency in naming their reactivity was quickly recognized, leading to the initiative of the Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigen (HLDA) workshops [2, 3]. Organized by the Human Cell Differentiation Molecules (HCDM), these wet-lab workshops have been run since the 1980s for experimental validation of the reactivity and specificity of mAb clones [2]. The Human Cell Differentiation Molecules (HCDM) organizes Human Leukocyte Differentiation Antigen (HLDA) workshops to test and name clusters of antibodies that react with a specific antigen. These cluster of differentiation (CD) markers have provided the scientific community with validated antibody clones, consistent naming of targets and reproducible identification of leukocyte subsets. Quantitative CD marker expression profiles and benchmarking of reagents at the singlecell level are currently lacking

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call