Abstract

Since 2013, after the 12 th ANP (National Regulatory Agency for Petroleum, Oil, and Biofuels) Bid Round hosted in Brazil, several public civil actions (PCA) put unconventional resources on hold due to the precautionary principle as main reason for legally restraining shale gas exploitation. Essentially, scientific uncertainties and possible irreversible and negative impacts to human health and environment are core to the precautionary principle. Shale gas has provided an unprecedented role for the U.S among natural gas global traders since its soaring exploitation has started more than a decade ago. As of 2009, though the 'shale boom' assisted the natural gas settlement within energy transition discussions, harnessing an unconventional resource still negatively resonates in some countries, i.e., France, and even in some of the U.S. states due to potential risks to human health and environment. Lacking scientific certainty to deal with these risks may also contribute to public opinion's rejection and legal restraints to additional exploitation, as seen with the precautionary principle application in Brazil. As further suggested in this paper, some of the risks (i.e., structural building failures, wastewater disposal, and fugitive emission) may represent lesser concerns whenever technical standards are rigorously followed, since their voluntary yet compelling guidelines have been designed and tested toward safety and quality for consumers. The paper objective is to fill some of the constraining gaps for the shale gas development and broaden qualified discussion to reduce complexity and increase transparency of the Brazilian regulatory regime. By presenting benchmarked technical standards applied in successful experiences related to shale gas, this paper finds reasonable arguments to resume unconventional resources debate in Brazil, specifically to address shale gas risk matters. An orderly risk management supported by specific standards may induce a precautionary principle ease, alongside with additional geology studies regarding sedimentary basins to avoid continued scientific uncertainties. Keywords: shale gas, precautionary principle, standardization DOI: 10.7176/RHSS/12-2-02 Publication date: January 31 st 2022

Highlights

  • Introduction to shale gas scenarioAccording to EIA (2014), promising unconventional resources are located in several basins around the world and www.iiste.orgChina ranks first among top 10 countries with technically recoverable shale gas resources, while Brazil places in last position (Figure 1)

  • By presenting benchmarked technical standards applied in successful experiences related to shale gas, this paper finds reasonable arguments to resume unconventional resources debate in Brazil, to address shale gas risk matters

  • Throughout the U.S and China's benchmark regarding shale gas-related standards, this paper suggests that Brazil may find reasonable arguments to resume unconventional resources discussion with the expansion of its natural gas supply and foster energy security

Read more

Summary

Spec 14A Subsurface Safety Valve Equipment

RP 14B Design, Installation, Operation, Test, and Redress of Subsurface Safety Valve Systems. RP 14C Analysis, Design, Installation, and Testing of Safety Systems for Offshore Production Facilities. RP 14G Fire Prevention and Control on Fixed Open-Type Offshore Production Platforms

Spec 16C Choke and Kill Equipment
25 Bull 97 Well Construction Interface Document Guidelines
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call