Abstract

Surface properties of nanomaterials are important characteristics influencing the in vivo fate. Today, the most common parameter considered while characterizing nanomaterials surfaces evaluates their surface charge through the determination of the zeta potential. Zeta potential can be deduced from measurement of the electrophoretic mobility of nanomaterials dispersed in aqueous media by well established methods that are described in the standards ISO 13099. Among the different methods, electrophoretic light scattering (ELS) is used in routine in many laboratories. Most marketed apparatus using ELS provide with an apparent zeta potential that depends on experimental conditions and models applied to convert the measured electrophoretic mobility into a value of zeta potential. Although widely used, no validated protocols or approach to perform such a validation were proposed so far to apply the method. This paper was aimed to propose a standardization of a protocol for evaluating zeta potential of nanomaterials by ELS and a methodology to achieve its validation. The robustness, precision and trueness were investigated using reference materials including positive and negative standards. To assess the robustness, experimental factors that could influence results from measurements of zeta potential were considered. These included the batch of measurement cells, the temperature of sample, the type of measurement cells and the analyst giving reliability of protocol for normal usage. Specifics methods of nested designs were developed to investigate robustness and precision and interpret the results using analysis of variance ANOVA. The estimation of the contribution of each factor to the total variance using the estimated mean square values and the equations for expected mean square was used to interpret the ANOVA table. When this method could not be used because of the obtaining of a negative value of the variance, the method based on pooled variances was used to interpret the ANOVA table. The proposed protocol was found robust, accurate and consistent with the standard ISO 13099-2. Uncertainty of the protocol were 14 and 12% for nanomaterials of negative and positive charges respectively proving reliability of results and approving the validity of the protocol used.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.