Abstract
This chapter weighs the stakes of the Hegel debate by questioning why Martin Heidegger ended up rejecting Herbert Marcuse's study. It contends the impossibility to separate the philosophical debate over Hegel given Heidegger's turn to radical conservatism in the late 1920s and the recent appearance of the Black Notebooks. It also relates the Davos debate in Peter E. Gordon's reading to Heidegger's changing political sensibilities. The chapter looks at Theodor W. Adorno's lifelong and ambivalent struggle with Heidegger as he judged Being and Time as fascist right down to its innermost components. It analyses Jargon der Eigentlichkeit (The Jargon of Authenticity) from 1964, which stated that Heidegger's book acquired its aura by describing the directions of the dark drives of the intelligentsia before 1933.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
