Abstract

The issue of earnings management has continued to be problematic in the financial reporting context. It has proved to be an important topic that concerns a wide range of stakeholders including regulators, investors and preparers. This paper examines the perceptions of Libyan Commercial Banks' (LCBs) stakeholders regarding earnings management (EM) motivations and techniques. The paper reports on a questionnaire survey of stakeholders which yielded 102 Responses (response rate 53%). It is found that LCBs’ managers are engaged in EM practices as a result of a number of motivations. In consistent with accounting literature on EM, LCBs’ managers tend to use Loan Loss Provision LLP as well as other techniques to manage their earnings. However, the research finding reveal some other “techniques” that are being used for EM. Some of them clearly lay out of GAAP and law framework which may be seen as an explicit breach to bank managers’ accountability. The importance of the banking sector for society has been amply demonstrated in recent years. The evidence provided by the questionnaire results refer to a serious problem to the accountability of LCBs’ managers. The existence of these motivations, which appear to be unavoidable, put pressure on the accountability process and expose it to a lack of trust and disrepute which therefore may have an adverse effect on the relationship between LCBs’ managers and their stakeholders. LCBs’ manager should be free from such motivations in order to produce unbiased and fair accounting information.

Highlights

  • Literature on earnings management attributes the existence of such a practice to conflict of interests between owners and managers (Wu et al, 2016)

  • This paper explores the Libyan Commercial Banks’s stakeholders’ perceptions in relation to the motivations and managerial incentives that induce bank managers to involve in earnings management

  • The mean score of the Preparers group, on balance, suggests doubt about whether the Loan Loss Provision (LLP) could be used for earnings management purposes; but all the other stakeholders groups agreed with the view that it could as indicated by the mean scores

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Literature on earnings management attributes the existence of such a practice to conflict of interests between owners and managers (Wu et al, 2016). This paper explores the Libyan Commercial Banks’s stakeholders’ perceptions in relation to the motivations and managerial incentives that induce bank managers to involve in earnings management. This study contributes to the literature in two respects It is perhaps the first study in Libya to examine the EM motivations and techniques. The present paper fills the research gap by examining why LCBs’ managers are engaged in EM and how earnings can be managed. We add to the earnings management literature in general and in Libya in particular by eextending the prior work of Barghathi et al (2017) who confirmed the existence of EM.

Literature review
Managerial incentives for earnings management
Earnings management in the banking industry
Research methodology
Stakeholders’ perceptions about earnings management motivations
11.2 To influence stock price – private
To decrease tax payment – state
Perceptions about earnings management tools
Foreign currency
Findings
Summary and discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call