Abstract

Research indicates that stakeholder pressures influence the adoption of green supply chain management (GSCM) practices; however, our understanding of the heterogeneity between different stakeholder groups remains limited. Drawing upon stakeholder theory, we identify the heterogeneity between five stakeholder groups: supplier, customer, community, competitor and government with relation to the adoption of GSCM practices. Empirically, we test how this heterogeneity affects GSCM practices by a configuration approach with 418 responses from Chinese manufacturing sector. Our results suggest that varying stakeholders are related to varying levels of the adoption of GSCM practices for Chinese manufacturers. Specifically, the results from cluster analysis categories three Chinese manufacturers with respect to the level in responding to the stakeholder pressures: sensible, cognizant and conscious manufacturers. Moreover, further ANOVA results show overall stakeholder pressures relates to the adoption of GSCM practice with customer rather than supplier. This research contributes to stakeholder theory at a more detailed level than before in the related literature, as well as study the relationship with the adoption of GSCM practices, which has not been done before. By doing so, this research represents an important step toward refining the stakeholder theory and the adoption of GSCM practice in manufacturing companies in emerging economies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.