Abstract

Brain CT has been recommended in staging of patients with lung cancer because of its usefulness in the detection of metastases. Purpose of this study is to examine if a diagnostic brain CT (CT,) can be obviated when an integrated PET/CT (PET/CT) is available. 87 consecutive patients underwent a diagnostic brain CT and a whole-body PET/CT within a period of 3 weeks to stage a known primary tumour. CT examinations were evaluated by two experienced neuroradiologists on the detection of brain lesions (benign and malignant). The results of PET/CT and CT reading were compared and both readings were compared with the clinical results. Statistical analysis was done by measuring sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy. The relative accuracies were compared by a McNemar (exact) test for correlated proportions. Considering the CT, as standard of reference, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy for the brain CT of PET/CT (CT2) and PET/CT were respectively 83%, 96%, 77%, 97%, 94% and 69%, 98%, 90%, 95%, 94%. Considering the clinical diagnosis as standard of reference these figures were for CT1, CT2 and PET/CT respectively 80%, 100%, 100%, 96%, 96% and 66%, 95%, 77%, 93%, 90% and 66%, 97%, 83%, 93%, 91%. There was no statistical difference between CT1 and CT2. The comparison of the additional CT in PET/CT with a diagnostic CT of the brain did not yield a statistical difference in the detection of brain lesions despite the inferior quality of the CT component of PET/CT. A diagnostic brain CT can be obviated when a PET/CT is available.

Highlights

  • Brain Computed Tomography (CT) has been recommended in staging of patients with lung cancer because of its usefulness in the detection of metastases

  • The purpose of our study is to examine if a diagnostic brain CT (CT1) can be obviated when an integrated Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT is available

  • The four patients with malignant brain lesions detected with CT2, were those patients with a lung tumour and with neurological symptoms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Brain CT has been recommended in staging of patients with lung cancer because of its usefulness in the detection of metastases. Purpose of this study is to examine if a diagnostic brain CT (CT1) can be obviated when an integrated PET/CT (PET/CT ) is available. The sensitivity of PET in revealing cerebral metastases in patients with malignancy has been reported at 6882% when compared with anatomic imaging [8]. In one study published in 1996 with 402 lung cancer patients, researchers reported a 38% specificity of PET alone when compared with anatomic imaging [9]. A CT scan of the brain is included in an integrated PET/CT study The quality of this brain scan is inferior compared to a diagnostic CT of the brain but may detect metastatic disease. The purpose of our study is to examine if a diagnostic brain CT (CT1) can be obviated when an integrated PET/CT is available

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call