Stages of implementation of administrative procedure in the field of environmental protection and natural resources

Abstract

The scientific article is devoted to the disclosure of the implementation of the administrative procedure in the field of environmental protection and natural resources. The categories «stage», «administrative procedure» and «stages of administrative procedure», stages of administrative procedure in the field of environmental protection and natural resources are compared. A description of the stages of the administrative procedure in the field of environmental protection and natural resources.It is established that the implementation of the administrative procedure in the field of environmental protection and natural resources allowed possibly through the following stages: 1) application of the person and acceptance of the application for consideration by the authorized unit of the public administration body; 2) consideration of the case; 3) making a decision; 4) appeal against the decision (optional); 5) execution of the decision.The decision-making stage is often distinguished only conditionally, as it usually merges with the previous stage as its logical conclusion. But where it is separated in time from the stage of consideration of the case on the merits, it is even possible to re-examine the documents and other evidence considered at the previous stage and, in addition, the analysis of the newly presented evidence. The decision is made by the units of the State Service of Geology and Subsoil of Ukraine on the basis of law, objective data, internal conviction. At the stage of making (making) a decision, a legal assessment of the collected information is provided, the case materials are fully and comprehensively investigated in order to establish the objective truth, a specific decision is made.From the set of questions of inner conviction should be singled out the question of freedom and independent of external influences assessment of evidence confirming a right, duty of the citizen, then - the question of making a decision that does not raise doubts about the authenticity of documents and facts, nor in the aspect of their internal consistency. This means that in the case of comparing the documents and facts that underlie the confirmation of the right, duty of the citizen, a certain part of them (or even a separate document) will contradict the already ready or being prepared to form a belief; these doubts should be removed by further verification of documents and evidence or by the submission of new documents and evidence.