Stage I lung cancer patients with or without symptoms – are the patients different and should we treat them differently?

Abstract

Introduction A large proportion of stage I cancers are found incidentally, which appears to be a prognostic factor. We investigated stage I lung cancers according to whether, or not, there had been clinical suspicion of lung cancer prior to referral and to see, if we could detect any difference regarding patient characteristics, work-up and mortality for incidental vs non-incidental findings as well as for asymptomatic vs symptomatic patients. Methods Medical records and referral documents for 177 patients diagnosed with stage I lung cancer were reviewed and divided based on whether the initial CT scan leading to diagnosis had been made due to suspicion of lung cancer or not. Patient characteristics and mortality between groups were compared, as well as mortality between patients with and without symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Results One-hundred-and-eight patients were diagnosed incidentally, while 69 patients were non-incidental findings. Among the incidental findings, 55% had no symptoms, whereas none in the non-incidental group were asymptomatic. Personal characteristics were comparable between the groups. Significantly more patients in the incidental group had malignant comorbidity. Non-malignant chronic co-morbidity was more prevalent in the non-incidental group, in particular lung disease. There was no difference in tumour size, histology, or survival for incidental vs non-incidental or for asymptomatic vs symptomatic patients. Conclusion A large proportion of stage I lung cancers are found incidentally, especially in patients with malignant co-morbidity. We found no difference in survival to indicate that we did or should handle these patient groups differently.