Abstract

This paper explores the work of peripheral experts who lack formal authority to produce change operations in a bureaucratic organization. I theorize these dynamics in terms of staff-line relations and draw on fifteen months of ethnographic fieldwork to map the struggle of a team of process improvement, knowledge management, and project management specialists to influence the aircraft development work in an aeronautical company. While previous literature documents that close ties and awareness about the work context enables experts to influence operations, I find that these conditions may be necessary but not sufficient. Specifically, I find that experts drew on their ties and awareness to translate tools and services according to the work context and paced their offer in a stepwise manner. Yet, as line employees rejected or ignored their tools and services, they deployed stealthy ways to infiltrate operations, piggybacking opportunities to implement their ideas and trying to bait interest among technical workers and managers. I build on my findings to theorize the organizational challenges faced by experts to accomplish their professional mandate in complex organizations and translate ideas into practice, thus refining our understanding of expert work in organizations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call