Abstract
Simple SummaryIt is critical for women who are diagnosed with a pelvic mass, or an ovarian cyst to be accurately assessed for their risk of having an ovarian malignancy. Accurate risk stratification for these women will allow for appropriate triage and referral to centers best equipped to treat women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. In this study, machine learning (ML) algorithms were used to determine the optimal combination of biomarkers for prediction of malignancy in women presenting with a pelvic mass. Nine unique ML algorithms were employed to evaluate age, menopausal status, race, and levels of 67 biomarkers from serum, urine, and plasma samples prospectively collected in a cohort 140 women with a variety of pelvic mass diagnoses benign and malignant. A complex statistical algorithm using serum levels of CA125, HE4 and transferrin provided greater than 93% sensitivity and specificity for the preoperative prediction of malignancy in women presenting with a pelvic mass.Objective: To identify the most predictive parameters of ovarian malignancy and develop a machine learning (ML) based algorithm to preoperatively distinguish between a benign and malignant pelvic mass. Methods: Retrospective study of 70 predictive parameters collected from 140 women with a pelvic mass. The women were split into a 3:1 “training” to “testing” dataset. Feature selection was performed using Gini impurity through an embedded random forest model and principal component analysis. Nine unique ML classifiers were assessed across a variety of model-specific hyperparameters using 25 bootstrap resamples of the training data. Model predictions were then combined into an ensemble stack by LASSO regression. The final ensemble stack and individual classifiers were then applied to the testing dataset to assess model performance. Results: Feature selection identified HE4, CA125, and transferrin as three predictive parameters of malignancy. Assessment of the ensemble stack on the testing dataset outperformed all individual ML classifiers in predicting malignancy. The ensemble stack demonstrated an accuracy of 97.1%, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.951, and a sensitivity of 93.3% with a specificity of 100%. Conclusions: Combining the measurement of three distinct biomarkers with the stacking of multiple ML classifiers into an ensemble can provide valuable preoperative diagnostic predictions for patients with a pelvic mass.
Highlights
Accurate and early identification of a malignant pelvic mass is essential for appropriate triage, referral, and subsequent care for women diagnosed with an ovarian malignancy
While most malignant pelvic masses fall into the category of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), which includes fallopian tube, ovarian and primary peritoneal malignancies, a small proportion of malignant pelvic masses include other malignancies, such as non-EOC, endometrial and cervical malignancies, and metastatic disease to the ovaries [5]
Length of survival following diagnosis has improved dramatically with the current standard of care, overall survival remains poor, as nearly 80% of women diagnosed with fallopian tube and ovarian cancer are identified at an advanced stage [5]
Summary
Accurate and early identification of a malignant pelvic mass is essential for appropriate triage, referral, and subsequent care for women diagnosed with an ovarian malignancy. Referral of women with a potential malignant pelvic mass or a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Length of survival following diagnosis has improved dramatically with the current standard of care, overall survival remains poor, as nearly 80% of women diagnosed with fallopian tube and ovarian cancer are identified at an advanced stage [5]. Multiple algorithms have been developed to assist physicians with risk stratification of woman diagnosed with an ovarian cyst or pelvic mass. Assessment tools solely used serum measurements of the cancer antigen 125 (CA125) biomarker to stratify patients into high- and low-risk groups for being diagnosed with an EOC. While initial results were promising, the variation of ultrasound image quality can cause a significant decrease in algorithm performance [7]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.