Stackelberg Scheduling Strategies

Abstract

We study the problem of optimizing the performance of a system shared by selfish, noncooperative users. We consider the concrete setting of scheduling small jobs on a set of shared machines possessing latency functions that specify the amount of time needed to complete a job, given the machine load. We measure system performance by the total latency of the system. Assigning jobs according to the selfish interests of individual users, who wish to minimize only the latency that their own jobs experience, typically results in suboptimal system performance. However, in many systems of this type there is a mixture of selfishly and jobs. The congestion due to centrally controlled jobs will influence the actions of selfish users, and we thus aspire to contain the degradation in system performance due to selfish behavior by scheduling the centrally controlled jobs in the best possible way. We formulate this goal as an optimization problem via Stackelberg games, games in which one player acts a leader (here, the centralized authority interested in optimizing system performance) and the rest as followers (the selfish users). The problem is then to compute a strategy for the leader (a Stackelberg strategy) that induces the followers to react in a way that (approximately) minimizes the total latency in the system. In this paper, we prove that it is NP-hard to compute an optimal Stackelberg strategy and present simple strategies with provably good performance guarantees. More precisely, we give a simple algorithm that computes a strategy inducing a job assignment with total latency no more than a constant times that of the optimal assignment of all of the jobs; in the absence of centrally controlled jobs and a Stackelberg strategy, no result of this type is possible. We also prove stronger performance guarantees in the special case where every machine latency function is linear in the machine load.