Stack versus Te technique for central slip reconstruction during vascularized toe proximal interphalangeal joint transfer.

Abstract

Significant extension deficit is a common problem after a vascularized toe proximal interphalangeal joint transfer. One of the main causes related to extensor lag is central slip deficiency of the donor toes. In our clinical practice, we performed both the Stack and Te technique to reconstruct central slip function during a joint transfer. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of vascularized joint transfers between these two techniques. From May 2009 to October 2021, 38 digits in 36 patients (28 men and 8 women) underwent free vascularized toe joint transfer requiring central slip reconstruction. Eight and 30 digits were reconstructed with the Stack and Te technique, respectively. The median length of follow-up was 19 months (range, 5 to 78 months). The overall median extension lag was 20±20 degrees and the flexion was 80±20 degrees. There were no significant differences in extension lag (25±29 vs. 20±15 degrees, p = 0.281), flexion (75±10 vs. 85±20 degrees, p = 0.13), and range of motion (53±23 vs. 63±15 degrees, p = 0.076) of the joints between the Stack and Te techniques after the transfers. From the limited number of cases, both the Stack and Te techniques provided similar outcomes in correcting extension lag in vascularized joint transfers. The Te technique is a simplified and effective method for central slip reconstruction, while caution is advised when using the Stack technique due to potential complications.Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.