Abstract

Context. At present, there are strong indications that white dwarf (WD) stars with masses well below the Chandrasekhar limit (MCh ≈ 1.4 M⊙) contribute a significant fraction of SN Ia progenitors. The relative fraction of stable iron-group elements synthesized in the explosion has been suggested as a possible discriminant between MCh and sub-MCh events. In particular, it is thought that the higher-density ejecta of MCh WDs, which favours the synthesis of stable isotopes of nickel, results in prominent [Ni II] lines in late-time spectra (≳150 d past explosion). Aims. We study the explosive nucleosynthesis of stable nickel in SNe Ia resulting from MCh and sub-MCh progenitors. We explore the potential for lines of [Ni II] in the optical an near-infrared (at 7378 Å and 1.94 μm) in late-time spectra to serve as a diagnostic of the exploding WD mass. Methods. We reviewed stable Ni yields across a large variety of published SN Ia models. Using 1D MCh delayed-detonation and sub-MCh detonation models, we studied the synthesis of stable Ni isotopes (in particular, 58Ni) and investigated the formation of [Ni II] lines using non-local thermodynamic equilibrium radiative-transfer simulations with the CMFGEN code. Results. We confirm that stable Ni production is generally more efficient in MCh explosions at solar metallicity (typically 0.02–0.08 M⊙ for the 58Ni isotope), but we note that the 58Ni yield in sub-MCh events systematically exceeds 0.01 M⊙ for WDs that are more massive than one solar mass. We find that the radiative proton-capture reaction 57Co(p, γ)58Ni is the dominant production mode for 58Ni in both MCh and sub-MCh models, while the α-capture reaction on 54Fe has a negligible impact on the final 58Ni yield. More importantly, we demonstrate that the lack of [Ni II] lines in late-time spectra of sub-MCh events is not always due to an under-abundance of stable Ni; rather, it results from the higher ionization of Ni in the inner ejecta. Conversely, the strong [Ni II] lines predicted in our 1D MCh models are completely suppressed when 56Ni is sufficiently mixed with the innermost layers, which are rich in stable iron-group elements. Conclusions. [Ni II] lines in late-time SN Ia spectra have a complex dependency on the abundance of stable Ni, which limits their use in distinguishing among MCh and sub-MCh progenitors. However, we argue that a low-luminosity SN Ia displaying strong [Ni II] lines would most likely result from a Chandrasekhar-mass progenitor.

Highlights

  • We studied the explosive nucleosynthesis of stable nickel and its dominant isotope 58Ni in SNe Ia to test its use as a diagnostic of the progenitor white dwarf (WD) mass

  • Among all reactions ending in 58Ni, we find that the radiative proton-capture reaction 57Co(p, γ)58Ni mostly determines the final 58Ni abundance in both MCh and subMCh models

  • The systematic absence of [Ni ii] lines in late-time spectra of sub-MCh models is due to the higher Ni ionization in the inner ejecta, where Ni iii dominates over Ni ii

Read more

Summary

Explosion models and radiative transfer

One exception is the 1D MCh delayed-detonation model 5p0_Z0p014, published here for the first time, whose WD progenitor results from the evolution of a 5 M star at solar metallicity (Z = 0.014; Asplund et al 2009). The explosive phase was simulated using the same hydrodynamics and nucleosynthesis code as the sub-MCh detonation models 1p06_Z2p25e-2 and 0p88_Z2p25e-2 from a 1.06 M and 0.88 M WD progenitor, respectively, at slightly super-solar metallicity (Z = 0.025 ≈ 1.6 Z ; Bravo et al 2019). For a WD composed of only 12C, 16O, 22Ne, and 56Fe (i.e. X(12C) + X(16O) = 1 − X(22Ne) − X(56Fe)), the electron fraction is (see Kushnir et al 2020): Ye. time spectra for the low-luminosity MCh delayed-detonation model DDC25 and the sub-MCh detonation model SCH2p0 are from Blondin et al (2018).

Nuclear statistical equilibrium
Freeze-out yields
Decayed yields at one year past explosion
Synthesis of the stable isotope 58Ni
Chandrasekhar-mass models
Sub-Chandrasekhar-mass models
Summary
Macroscopic versus microscopic mixing
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call