Abstract

(1,2) In this theoretical study, we apply MesoFON, a field-calibrated individual-based model of mangrove forest dynamics, and its Lotka–Volterra interpretations to address two questions: (a) Do the dynamics of two identical red mangrove species that compete for light resources and avoid inter-specific competition by lateral crown displacement follow the predictions of classical competition theory or resource competition theory? (b) Which mechanisms drive the dynamics in the presence of inter-specific crown plasticity when local competition is combined with global or with localized seed dispersal? (3) In qualitative support of classical competition theory, the two species can stably coexist within MesoFON. However, the total standing stock at equilibrium matched the carrying capacity of the single species. Therefore, a “non-overyielding” Lotka–Volterra model rather than the classic one approximated best the observed behavior. Mechanistically, inter-specific crown plasticity moved heterospecific trees apart and pushed conspecifics together. Despite local competition, the community exhibited mean-field dynamics with global dispersal. In comparison, localized dispersal slowed down the dynamics by diminishing the strength of intra-/inter-specific competition and their difference due to a restriction in the competitive race to the mean-field that prevails between conspecific clusters. (4) As the outcome in field-calibrated IBMs is mediated by the competition for resources, we conclude that classical competition mechanisms can override those of resource competition, and more species are likely to successfully coexist within communities.

Highlights

  • Individual-based models (IBMs) simulate the complex life-cycle of individual organisms, including their usage of dynamic resources and their variation among each other within and between life-stages [1]

  • The results qualitatively support the classical competition theory proposed by Lotka and Volterra

  • In qualitative support of the LV-model, two identical Rhizophora species that avoid competition with one another by lateral crown displacement can stably coexist in the “small world” of a field-calibrated individual-based model with a homogeneous environment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Individual-based models (IBMs) simulate the complex life-cycle of individual organisms, including their usage of dynamic resources and their variation among each other within and between life-stages [1]. The dynamics of field-calibrated individualbased models of plant communities have deviated from the behavior of a mean field [2], where “individual organisms encounter one another in proportion to their average abundance across space” [3] or, more stringently formulated, “where the interactions are global, that is mortality depends on global density and/or dispersal is infinite” [4]. This has been demonstrated by comparing the dynamics of two models: the original IBM in which interactions among plants and/or the dispersal of seeds were local (in line with natural conditions) and a model in which interactions/dispersal were artificially extended and made global. Spatial patterns assumed to indiscriminately arise in the IBMs from local competition and localized seed dispersal have been made responsible for the deviations [2]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call