Abstract

Cloud cavitation always causes severe damage to the efficiency and stability of the hydraulic machinery, resulting in extra energy losses in the system. We have observed an effective and simple way to prevent cloud cavitation formation by placing an obstacle near the hydrofoil's trailing edge. Cavitating flows around four different types of hydrofoils were simulated using the stress-blended eddy simulation turbulence model: the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) 66 hydrofoil and the NACA 66 hydrofoil with a 1 ×1 mm2 obstacle at 0.3c, 0.5c, or 0.7c. Sheet cavitation is the predominant mode of cavity flow when the obstruction is positioned at 0.7c. To find out why the cloud cavitation growth can be stopped when the obstruction is positioned at 0.7c, the velocity field, vorticity in the Z direction, and vortex structure of the Q-criterion were computed. To study the energy loss of the cavity flow and comprehend how obstacles affect it, the local entropy production rate was computed. It was discovered that the vorticity downstream of the obstacle, positioned at 0.7c, is restructured, which helps manage the flow separation upstream of the obstacle. Consequently, the hydrofoil's suction surface vorticity nearly rotates in the same direction as the obstacle at 0.7c, and the direction of Vx upstream of the obstacle is in the positive direction of the X axis, indicating that the reentrant flow has been controlled upstream of the 0.7c obstacle. Furthermore, cavitation shedding and the entropy production rate are strongly correlated, and regulating cloud cavitation growth is advantageous for energy conservation.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call