Abstract

Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and its reverse – Mesenchymal to Epithelial Transition (MET) – are hallmarks of cellular plasticity during embryonic development and cancer metastasis. During EMT, epithelial cells lose cell-cell adhesion and gain migratory and invasive traits either partially or completely, leading to a hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal (hybrid E/M) or a mesenchymal phenotype respectively. Mesenchymal cells move individually, but hybrid E/M cells migrate collectively as observed during gastrulation, wound healing, and the formation of tumor clusters detected as Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs). Typically, the hybrid E/M phenotype has largely been tacitly assumed to be transient and ‘metastable’. Here, we identify certain ‘phenotypic stability factors’ (PSFs) such as GRHL2 that couple to the core EMT decision-making circuit (miR-200/ZEB) and stabilize hybrid E/M phenotype. Further, we show that H1975 lung cancer cells can display a stable hybrid E/M phenotype and migrate collectively, a behavior that is impaired by knockdown of GRHL2 and another previously identified PSF - OVOL. In addition, our computational model predicts that GRHL2 can also associate hybrid E/M phenotype with high tumor-initiating potential, a prediction strengthened by the observation that the higher levels of these PSFs may be predictive of poor patient outcome. Finally, based on these specific examples, we deduce certain network motifs that can stabilize the hybrid E/M phenotype. Our results suggest that partial EMT, i.e. a hybrid E/M phenotype, need not be ‘metastable’, and strengthen the emerging notion that partial EMT, but not necessarily a complete EMT, is associated with aggressive tumor progression.

Highlights

  • During metastasis, cancer cells leave the primary tumor, travel through the circulation, and seed secondary tumors in distant organs

  • Similar co-expression of E and M markers at a single-cell level has been observed in multiple cell lines belonging to breast cancer [11, 17] and lung cancer [20], www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget as well as in metastatic brain tumors [21], Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs)(22), and tumor buds - clusters of 1-5 malignant cells observed at the invasive front of the tumor [23]

  • H1299 cells moved largely as single cells, but H1975 cells filled the wound moving collectively and forming finger-like projections (Figure 1B). These finger-like projections are the hallmarks of collective migration as noted earlier for migration of terminal end buds (TEBs) [14], and suggest that collective cell migration as sheets or clusters might be observed in tumors as well, as reflected by tumor budding [23] and the migration of CTCs in clusters that are formed before entering the circulation [24]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cancer cells leave the primary tumor, travel through the circulation, and seed secondary tumors in distant organs. Metastasis can be fueled by the engines of cellular plasticity - bidirectional transitions between the epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes the Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and its reverse the Mesenchymal to Epithelial Transition (MET) [1]. Cells undergoing EMT lose their cell-cell adhesion and gain migratory and invasive traits to invade the basement membrane and enter the blood vessels as Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) [2]. These CTCs exit at distant organs and usually undergo MET to settle down and proliferate in order to form secondary tumors during metastasis [1]. Elucidating the principles of this cellular plasticity is expected to offer crucial clues for halting metastatic progression

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call