Abstract
The stability and degradation mechanism of graphitized (Graphene nanosheets) and more amorphous (Vulcan XC-72R) carbon-supported palladium nanoparticles was investigated. Coupling identical-location transmission electron microscopy (ILTEM) and electrochemistry enabled to correlate the distribution of the Pd nanoparticles under accelerated stress test (up to 1000cycles between 0.1 and 1.23V vs. RHE, in a 0.1M NaOH solution at 25°C) with changes in electrochemical accessible surface area (ECSA). The carbon-supported Pd nanoparticles undergo similar rates of degradation in terms of electrochemical surface areas on both supports. However, their mechanisms of degradation differ: on amorphous carbon, the primary mode of degradation is Pd nanoparticles detachment (and minor agglomeration), whereas on graphitized supports it is more likely their coalescence and dissolution/redeposition. “Bulk” carbon-corrosion is negligible in both cases, as proven by ex situ Raman spectroscopy. So, using a graphitized carbon support (Graphene nanosheets) versus a more amorphous one (Vulcan XC-72R) does not enable to significantly depreciate the Pd/C catalyst degradation in alkaline media.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
