Abstract

We quantified the stability constants of Zr(IV) with ethylenediamine-N,N,N’,N’-tetraacetic acid (EDTA), trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N,N,N’,N’-tetraacetic acid (CDTA), and diethylenetriamine-N,N,N’,N’’,N’’-pentaacetic acid (DTPA) in 0.75–1.00 mol∙L−1 HClO4 with 1.00 mol∙L−1 total ionic strength using a liquid-liquid extraction technique. The data indicated the formation of ubiquitous 1:1 complexes, but also newly reported 1:2 metal-ligand complexes. The 1:1 complexes were identified as Zr(EDTA)0 (log10β101 = 27.9 ± 0.1), Zr(CDTA)0 (log10β101 = 29.6 ± 0.2), and Zr(DTPA)− (log10β101 = 35.3 ± 0.3), and the newly identified bis-complexes as Zr(EDTA)24− (log10β102 = 54.4 ± 0.2), ZrH4(CDTA)20 (log10β142 = 58.5 ± 0.5), and ZrH8(DTPA)22+ (log10β182 = 70.3 ± 0.4). The quantification of the stability constants described above required determining acid dissociation constants for EDTA and DTPA at varied ionic strength at 25.0 ± 0.1 °C by potentiometric titration, and the Specific ion Interaction Theory (SIT) model was used to correlate the acid dissociation constants with ionic strength. The resulting thermodynamic constants at zero ionic strength from this analysis for EDTA were: pKa3° = 2.21 ± 0.06, pKa4° = 3.21 ± 0.06, pKa5° = 6.76 ± 0.09, and pKa6° = 10.27 ± 0.03, and for DTPA were: pKa4° = 2.31 ± 0.02, pKa5° = 3.23 ± 0.07, pKa6° = 4.96 ± 0.05, pKa7° = 9.51 ± 0.05, and pKa8° = 11.21 ± 0.05.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.