Abstract

An accurate estimation of static and seismic earth pressures is extremely important in geotechnical design. The conventional Coulomb’s approach and Mononobe-Okabe’s approach have been widely used in engineering practice. However, the latter approach provides the linear distribution of seismic earth pressure behind a retaining wall in an approximate way. Therefore, the pseudo-dynamic method can be used to compute the distribution of seismic active earth pressure in a more realistic manner. The effect of wall and soil inertia must be considered for the design of a retaining wall under seismic conditions. The method proposed considers the propagation of shear and primary waves through the backfill soil and the retaining wall due to seismic excitation. The crude estimate of finding the approximate seismic acceleration makes the pseudo-static approach often unreliable to adopt in the stability assessment of retaining walls. The predictions of the active earth pressure using Coulomb theory are not consistent with the laboratory results to the development of arching in the backfill soil. A new method is proposed to compute the active earth pressure acting on the backface of a rigid retaining wall undergoing horizontal translation. The predictions of the proposed method are verified against results of laboratory tests as well as the results from other methods proposed in the past.

Highlights

  • Study of dynamic active earth pressure is essential for the safe design of a retaining wall in the seismic zone

  • The maximum value of FW is 1.41 and occurs at t/T = 0.081, whereas the maximum active thrust occurs at t/T = 0.402 and the value of FW is 1.02

  • In pseudo-dynamic method, by considering the phase change in shear and primary waves propagating in the backfill soil located behind the rigid retaining wall, the seismic active earth pressure distribution as well as the total active thrust is obtained in contrast to the pseudo-static method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Study of dynamic active earth pressure is essential for the safe design of a retaining wall in the seismic zone. Steedman and Zeng [26] proposed a simple pseudo-dynamic analysis to determine seismic active earth thrust on a retaining wall that incorporates phase difference and assumes amplification effects in the dry cohesionless backfill subjected only to horizontal acceleration that varies along the face of the wall. The solution is valid for a harmonic base excitation that satisfies the boundary condition These assumptions introduce very important limitations to the applicability of the solution to the design of retaining structures, a close-form solution has the advantage of providing a rational framework where the effects of different parameters can be analysed. A method for calculating the active earth pressures assuming Coulomb slip is proposed (Wang [49]) None of these studies considered the stress trajectory caused by the soil arching effect, a common phenomenon that is prevalent in geotechnical engineering practice. A simplified method for calculating the active earth pressure acting on a rigid retaining wall undergoing translation is proposed in this study

Seismic Active Thrust Using the Pseudo-Dynamic Method
Seismic Active Thrust Using the Modified Pseudo-Dynamic Method
Results and Discussion
Conclusion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call