Abstract

Corrugated walls were used in gas–solid bubbling fluidized beds to reduce minimum bubbling velocity and improve gas distribution. A thorough stability analysis of flat-wall (FWBFB) and corrugated-wall (CWBFB) bubbling fluidized beds was carried out using several geometrical bed declinations and operating conditions covering corrugation angles, clearances, initial rest bed heights and ratios of gas velocity to minimum bubbling velocity, U g/ U mb. Standard deviations of dynamic fluctuations for measured indicators such as bed differential pressure, wall-to-bed heat transfer coefficient, bed free surface and bed mean gray scale intensity (via digital image analysis), and simulated indicators (via 3-D CFD simulations) such as granular temperature and pressure, and solids volume fraction were monitored to compare the stability behaviors of FWBFB and CWBFB. It was concluded that at a given U g/ U mb, CWBFB offered more stable gas–solid fluidization operation than FWBFB. Every system turned more unstable with the increase in U g/ U mb, rest bed height and corrugation angle, but proved relatively insensitive to wall clearance. Full 3-D transient Euler–Euler CFD simulations were corroborated with experimental findings and further revealed that necks (narrowest clearances) were mainly responsible for the growth of instabilities in CWBFB as compared to hips (largest clearances).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.