Abstract
ObjectiveCardiac surgery demands highly effective cardioprotective regimens. We previously demonstrated improved cardioprotection with “polarized” compared with “depolarized” arrest. This study uses a clinically relevant porcine model of cardiopulmonary bypass to compare the efficacy of blood-based St Thomas' Hospital polarizing cardioplegia (STH-Pol-B) with blood-based St Thomas’ Hospital hyperkalemic cardioplegia (STH2-B). MethodsPigs were monitored and subjected to normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiac arrest via antegrade cold (4°C) blood cardioplegia (STH2-B, control group: n = 6 or STH-Pol-B, study group: n = 7), and global ischemia (60 minutes) followed by on-pump reperfusion (60 minutes) and subsequent off-pump reperfusion (90 minutes). At termination, tissue samples were taken for analysis of high-energy phosphates, ultrastructure, and microRNAs. The primary endpoint of this study was creatine kinase-muscle/brain release during reperfusion. ResultsCreatine kinase-muscle/brain was comparable in both groups. After pigs were weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass, hemodynamic parameters such as mean arterial pressure (P = .007), left ventricular systolic pressure (P < .001), external heart work (P = .012), stroke volume (P = .015), as well as dp/dtmax (P = .027), were improved with polarizing cardioplegia. Wedge pressure was significantly lower in the study group (P < .01). Energy charge was comparable between groups. MicroRNA-708-5p was significantly lower (P = .019) and microRNA-122 expression significantly (P = .046) greater in STH-Pol-B hearts. ConclusionsPolarized cardiac arrest offers similar myocardial protection and enhances functional recovery in a porcine model of cardiopulmonary bypass. Differential expression of microRNAs may indicate possible new ischemia–reperfusion markers. These results confirm the noninferiority and potential of polarized versus depolarized arrest.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
