Abstract
ObjectiveCardiac surgery demands highly effective cardioprotective regimens. We previously demonstrated improved cardioprotection with “polarized” compared with “depolarized” arrest. This study uses a clinically relevant porcine model of cardiopulmonary bypass to compare the efficacy of blood-based St Thomas' Hospital polarizing cardioplegia (STH-Pol-B) with blood-based St Thomas’ Hospital hyperkalemic cardioplegia (STH2-B). MethodsPigs were monitored and subjected to normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiac arrest via antegrade cold (4°C) blood cardioplegia (STH2-B, control group: n = 6 or STH-Pol-B, study group: n = 7), and global ischemia (60 minutes) followed by on-pump reperfusion (60 minutes) and subsequent off-pump reperfusion (90 minutes). At termination, tissue samples were taken for analysis of high-energy phosphates, ultrastructure, and microRNAs. The primary endpoint of this study was creatine kinase-muscle/brain release during reperfusion. ResultsCreatine kinase-muscle/brain was comparable in both groups. After pigs were weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass, hemodynamic parameters such as mean arterial pressure (P = .007), left ventricular systolic pressure (P < .001), external heart work (P = .012), stroke volume (P = .015), as well as dp/dtmax (P = .027), were improved with polarizing cardioplegia. Wedge pressure was significantly lower in the study group (P < .01). Energy charge was comparable between groups. MicroRNA-708-5p was significantly lower (P = .019) and microRNA-122 expression significantly (P = .046) greater in STH-Pol-B hearts. ConclusionsPolarized cardiac arrest offers similar myocardial protection and enhances functional recovery in a porcine model of cardiopulmonary bypass. Differential expression of microRNAs may indicate possible new ischemia–reperfusion markers. These results confirm the noninferiority and potential of polarized versus depolarized arrest.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
