Abstract
Abstract Predicting changes in plant diversity in response to human activities represents one of the major challenges facing ecologists and land managers striving for sustainable ecosystem management. Classical field studies have emphasized the importance of community primary productivity in regulating changes in plant species richness. However, experimental studies have yielded inconsistent empirical evidence, suggesting that primary productivity is not the sole determinant of plant diversity. Recent work has shown that more accurate predictions of changes in species diversity can be achieved by combining measures of species’ cover and height into an index of space resource utilization (SRU). While the SRU approach provides reliable predictions, it is time‐consuming and requires extensive taxonomic expertise. Ecosystem processes and plant community structure are likely driven primarily by dominant species (mass ratio effect). Within communities, it is likely that dominant and rare species have opposite contributions to overall biodiversity trends. We, therefore, suggest that better species richness predictions can be achieved by utilizing SRU assessments of only the dominant species (SRUD), as compared to SRU or biomass of the entire community. Here, we assess the ability of these measures to predict changes in plant diversity as driven by nutrient addition and herbivore exclusion. First, we tested our hypotheses by carrying out a detailed analysis in an alpine grassland that measured all species within the community. Next, we assessed the broader applicability of our approach by measuring the first three dominant species for five additional experimental grassland sites across a wide geographic and habitat range. We show that SRUD outperforms community biomass, as well as community SRU, in predicting biodiversity dynamics in response to nutrients and herbivores in an alpine grassland. Across our additional sites, SRUD yielded far better predictions of changes in species richness than community biomass, demonstrating the robustness and generalizable nature of this approach. Synthesis. The SRUD approach provides a simple, non‐destructive and more accurate means to monitor and predict the impact of global change drivers and management interventions on plant communities, thereby facilitating efforts to maintain and recover plant diversity.
Highlights
Hosting up to 89 species/m2 (Wilson, Peet, Dengler, & Partel, 2012) and covering about 40% of the land area (White, Murray, & Rohweder, 2000), grasslands represent some of the most diverse and widespread terrestrial ecosystems
We investigate a new method for measuring plant diversity dynamics aimed at tracking plant community responses to environmental change including human disturbances
We found that space resource utilization (SRU) provides stronger predictive power than biomass measurements, while being non‐destructive and easier to perform
Summary
Hosting up to 89 species/m2 (Wilson, Peet, Dengler, & Partel, 2012) and covering about 40% of the land area (White, Murray, & Rohweder, 2000), grasslands represent some of the most diverse and widespread terrestrial ecosystems. Available evidence suggests the general hypothesis that predictions of plant diversity dynamics based on changes in biomass or SRU depend on species abundance (Figure 1c), leading to the following hypotheses: (a) changes in SRU yield better predictions of changes in species richness than changes in biomass, (b) dominant species contribute most to community‐level estimations, (c) rare species indicate opposite predictions of plant diversity as compared to dominant species and the full community, weakening predictions from the full community, and (d) predictions from dominant species are better than those from the full community We tested these hypotheses by quantifying the effect of nutrient addition and herbivore exclusion on species‐ and community‐level plant biomass, height, cover, SRU and species richness using data from the Nutrient Network (Borer, Harpole, et al, 2014a). The performance of the SRUD approach was compared to that of conventional use of destructive biomass and total community SRU measures
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.