Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Chronic inflammation is associated with increased red blood cell (RBC) alloimmunization. Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD), systemic lupus erythematosus and inflammatory bowel disease, all conditions with increased levels of inflammation, have been shown to be more alloimmunized when compared to the general population. High prevalence rates of RBC alloimmunization have also been observed in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). It has recently been shown that an inflammatory microenvironment may be a key driver of MDS pathogenesis. There are a few specific genes recurrently mutated in MDS that have been found to be associated with activation of the innate immune system and formation of the inflammasome, including some involved in epigenetic modification - ASXL1, DNMT3A, EZH2 and TET2 - and spliceosome formation - SF3B1, SRSF2 and U2AF1. The aim of this study was to determine if the genetic mutations driving the inflammatory milieu in MDS could simultaneously be creating an environment that promotes alloimmunization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients diagnosed with a myeloid neoplasm, including patients with MDS and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), between 2015 and 2020 on whom a type and screen had been ordered. We recorded the patients’ primary diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, age at first sequencing, somatic mutations identified by next generation sequencing (NGS), blood type, antibody screen results, specific alloantibodies and autoantibodies identified, and number of RBC and platelet units transfused. Patients with an autoantibody, a clinically significant alloantibody, or non-specific reactivity with a potential antibody under investigation on their screen were put in the positive antibody screen category, and those with reactivity solely due to Rh immune globulin or monoclonal antibody therapy were put in the negative antibody screen category. Univariate logistic regression was run separately for patients initially diagnosed with AML and those initially diagnosed with a non-AML myeloid neoplasm (MN), using sex, age, race/ethnicity, number of RBC units transfused, and somatic mutation, to determine if any of these variables had a significant association with a positive antibody screen. If quasi-complete separation issues existed, Firth's method for separation was applied to the logistic regression model. All analyses were conducted using a 95% confidence level. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients met inclusion criteria; 44 were male and 32 were female, and ranged in age from 14 to 89 years. The majority of patients were Caucasian (n = 64). Thirty-three patients had an initial diagnosis of AML; 43 were initially diagnosed with a MN, including MDS (n = 36), myeloproliferative neoplasm (n = 2), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n = 4) and chronic myeloid leukemia (n = 1). Number of RBC units transfused ranged from 3 - 112 in patients with AML and 0 - 131 in patients with a MN. Thirteen patients with AML had a positive antibody screen (39.4%), compared to 21 patients with a MN (48.8%). Patients with AML most often developed an alloantibody without an accompanying autoantibody (58.3%), while patients with a MN most often developed alloantibodies in addition to autoantibodies (52.4%). Patients with a MN and a SRSF2 mutation had a significantly increased rate of allo- or auto-immunization as compared to patients with AML and a SRSF2 mutation (p-value = 0.035). Similarly, patients with a MN and a TET2 mutation had a significantly increased rate of allo- or auto-immunization as compared to patients with AML and a TET2 mutation (p-value = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a MN, the presence of a SRSF2 or TET2 mutation predicted the presence of at least one allo- or autoantibody. Our data support the hypothesis that genetic mutations involved in formation of the inflammasome may be involved in the increased alloimmunization seen in patients with MDS. Our study of alloimmunization in MDS, and further studies like it, may enable us to predict based on genetic mutations which patients with MDS may be at increased risk for becoming alloimmunized. Similar to prophylactic C, E and K antigen matching that some blood banks employ in patients with SCD to minimize formation of alloantibodies, extended phenotype matching for the most immunogenic antigens could also be considered in patients with MDS and SRSF2 or TET2 mutations to decrease alloimmunization in this patient population.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
SRSF2 Mutation
Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Myeloid Neoplasm
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
TET2 Mutation
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
HemaSphere
Sep 11, 2019
Blood
Nov 15, 2013
Blood
Dec 2, 2016
American Journal of Hematology
Sep 30, 2022
Cancer Cell
Aug 1, 2018
Leukemia
Feb 20, 2012
HemaSphere
Mar 23, 2021
British Journal of Haematology
Jun 27, 2021
Blood
Nov 13, 2019
Blood
Nov 29, 2018
Journal of Blood Disorders and Transfusion
Aug 27, 2016
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 20, 2017
Blood
Dec 2, 2016
Blood
Nov 19, 2010
Blood
Blood
Nov 23, 2023
Blood
Nov 17, 2023
Blood
Nov 17, 2023
Blood
Nov 16, 2023
Blood
Nov 16, 2023