Abstract
Early signs are that Sri Lanka’s Guarantor branch is an innovation that is developing resilience by stealth. It has been vulnerable and the subject of constitutional ping-pong due to dominant political parties, the ambivalence of the judiciary as well that of the Attorney-General. From the late 1980s, the proposal for a Constitutional Council and a Guarantor branch has gained ground, primarily due to demands by civil society and the support of minority political parties. This branch affirms an older tradition of independence of public institutions but is hybrid in its contemporary form due to its inclusion of the judiciary. I provide a constitutional perspective of these developments through a study of the 2000 Draft Constitution and the Seventeenth, Eighteenth, Nineteenth and Twentieth Amendments. Even though the Guarantor Branch has not been supported by strong governments or by the judiciary, it has been central to the state formation project as a means of advancing constitutionalism in Sri Lanka.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
