Abstract
In Part I of our inquiry we wish to consider the principal arguments typically adduced on behalf of a tenseless or B-Theory of time. The reader may be surprised to find no mention of McTaggart’s Paradox. This is because McTaggart’s famous argument is, as I understand it, primarily an argument against the reality of tense and, hence, an A-Theory of time. Rather than being a positive demonstration of the B-Theory, it attempts to show the logical incoherence of the tensed theory and so is best considered as an objection to the A-Theory of time. Accordingly, I have discussed it as such in my companion volume The Tensed Theory of Time: a Critical Examination. In this volume we wish to consider arguments which seek to demonstrate more positively the truth of a B-Theory of time.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
